>
funny that I've never read that before.
People say this say that, but we call them desktop engineers.
Ive known plenty of people that "break it in like you're going to drive it" with excellent results. Can you go forward with your explanation on WHY you think this way?
Is this motor completely stock? There is no cam break-in, a solid shot of boost will no-doubt seat those rings really well.
So tell me, where is your information coming from? Because i think you're a qualified desktop engineer sir, congratulations.
So please show me the documented evidence that mostly stock motors need any sort of break-in procedures.
QUOTE(playr158 @ Mar 21, 2007 - 9:30 PM) [snapback]538561[/snapback]
>
when you rebuild a motor you should rebuild...
but no you shouldn't "burst" accel or decel..
advice on breaking in a new motor is best found from your ENGINE BUILDER NOT on this site
but not going past 3k rpm and not boosting as much as possible....basic ways to just take it super easy on the engine i would image
when you rebuild a motor you should rebuild...
but no you shouldn't "burst" accel or decel..
advice on breaking in a new motor is best found from your ENGINE BUILDER NOT on this site
but not going past 3k rpm and not boosting as much as possible....basic ways to just take it super easy on the engine i would image
funny that I've never read that before.
People say this say that, but we call them desktop engineers.
Ive known plenty of people that "break it in like you're going to drive it" with excellent results. Can you go forward with your explanation on WHY you think this way?
Is this motor completely stock? There is no cam break-in, a solid shot of boost will no-doubt seat those rings really well.
So tell me, where is your information coming from? Because i think you're a qualified desktop engineer sir, congratulations.
So please show me the documented evidence that mostly stock motors need any sort of break-in procedures.






