-Toyota_guy31783+Sep 15, 2003 - 2:32 PM
well, either way, i don't think you can classify the gt-four in with the st1 or the evo.
I know it was once in the rally with those other cars, but the celica is a 2-door sports car while those others are 4door sedans.....I must admit that i like the looks of both the wrx and the evo, but from the specs sheet i got from the dealer the other day, the evo is running at 19psi....and thats just pert damn near crazy on a mitsu motor, in stock form.....so i would imagine that subauru has there kinks out of the wrx, being that the evo is just in its 1st year over here in america with all that extra emissions stuff on it.......
but either way you are lookin at 250whp with both sti and evo and the price is pretty much the same, body is pretty much the same, so its just in your peference at which to buy....
i also tried out an evo, and it was hella fun!!!
the evo's do run a lot of boost.
i would prefer the STI, .5 liters more displacement and a boxter style engine
1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition@gt4.wrc on Instagram
-EC_Knightrider+Sep 15, 2003 - 11:39 AM
-94TRDCeli+Sep 15, 2003 - 12:07 PM
I'd rather have an evo over the sti, the sti seems more problematic from consumer reports.
never driven either (evo or gt-4), but i must say that I HIGHLY doubt thet the GT-4 could even compare to the evo or a wrx from today- I mean come on now, these cars are technological leaders right now, and the celica is 10 years old. Not to mention the fact that the celica gt-4 ST205 couldent compete in the WRC with the likes of the WRX back then (and rememebr that it was using an illegal air intake to boost its power, which was discoverd and lead to the ban of the use of the celica ST205 from WRC events for several odd years).... there really is no comparison. Dont get me wrong, im not saying the GT-4 is garbage or bad in any way, im just saying its outclassed when you compare it to a WRX or EVO.
Car #3: 98 Accord LX- purchased 5/06, totaled 8/06Car #2: 95 Celica GT- purchased 8/03, current daily driverCar #1: 01 Focus ZX3- purchased 5/01, sold 8/03
I like the looks of the STI better, but the EVO drove much cleaner. Just everything seemed so much smoother in it, and Mitsubishi dealers normally don't get pissed about adding a turbo timer to your car to keep your turbo happy, but Subaru dealers do. A friend of mine got an STi, all he did was install a Turbo Timer...bam warranty is dead. 2 month old car.
95 Toyota Celica GTDead for now --> Soon to have a 3S-GTE02 WRX --> This is for speed- Borla Exhaust- TurboXS BOV- Custom CAI02 Civic EX- MB Quart Reference 5.25" Components- Rockford MTX 8" Subs in the doors- Alpine Type S Rear Fills- 2x Alpine SWR-1042D Subs in a custom fiberglass box- Alpine F345 Amp for the front doors- Alpine M605 on each Type R- Phoenix Gold wiring- Alpine CDA-9855 Head Unit- Alpine Amp link- 2x Rockford Fosgate 1 Farad Caps- The best Viper 791 alarm install ever
-saleeka+Sep 15, 2003 - 9:30 PM
Believer, you'll leave her, in leaving them allNo but I don't buy itLike anything you do, as anyone you areCause I'm...Ten Speed, of God's Blood & Burial
Subaru has been making Impreza WRX's since the end of October of 1992- just not for U.S. consumption until 2002.
Car #3: 98 Accord LX- purchased 5/06, totaled 8/06Car #2: 95 Celica GT- purchased 8/03, current daily driverCar #1: 01 Focus ZX3- purchased 5/01, sold 8/03
-EC_Knightrider+Sep 15, 2003 - 12:39 PM
-saleeka+Sep 19, 2003 - 11:40 PM
Man, every time i see an EVO VIII i just stare at it cuz they look so mean for being stock, and are fast as hell. I cant wait to be able to afford a serious car like that someday with a stock turbo hopefully... >

>
3rd gen ST205 3SGTE - Alive and boosting.
time for me to swallow my own words..... K 2 celica is right, it was TTE that was banned, not the car itself. I am right about the WRX though.
This post has been edited by saleeka: Sep 21, 2003 - 6:52 PM
Car #3: 98 Accord LX- purchased 5/06, totaled 8/06Car #2: 95 Celica GT- purchased 8/03, current daily driverCar #1: 01 Focus ZX3- purchased 5/01, sold 8/03