What if the G6 were just making its debut now, against today's crop of mostly ugly cars? Do you think it would be the hottest thing on the street?
What if . . . ? - 6G Celicas Forums
versus whats on the road now-a-days we would have the lowest horsepower besides the echo's, wave's, hybrids...even the lowest model g5 has 140hp but styling wise i think we would reign supreme , alot of newer cars are nasty like the WHOLE dodge line up is gross IMO.
94 Celica GT Hatchback 5spd89 Nissan 240sx coupe 5spd -RIP87 BMW 325 2dr 5spd - SOLD-Gone but never forgotten
X2 ^
yeah, the lack of horsepower compared to other cars on the market today would make it a bust. For the features offered it would probably cost arround 15-20's brand new, and for 16-20 you can pick up that new little chevy car, with over 200 hp...
However, the beauty of it could def. not be toped
We still own on who has the prettiest car
However, the beauty of it could def. not be toped
QUOTE (presure2 @ Nov 6, 2010 - 6:16 AM)Via FB: fcuking awsome!!! D-man FTW!QUOTE (DEATH @ Nov 11, 2008 - 5:40 PM)Damn D-Man - most impressive.QUOTE (99GT @ Nov 14, 2008 - 4:04 PM)D-Man's post should be a stickyQUOTE (samir0189 @ Nov 4, 2008 - 10:50 AM)LOL, oh boy, you can always count on D-Man for ridiculously hilarious posts.
I dont think I could afford one brand new in 2008...in 1994 GT4`s were £36,000 ish....god knows what it would cost now brand new???? I`d probably have to buy a second hand Impreza (Yuck) or somother junk.
This post has been edited by Insanity-74: Mar 23, 2008 - 11:05 AM
This post has been edited by Insanity-74: Mar 23, 2008 - 11:05 AM
if we had 6gc gt4 wrc edition I would say yes. Otherwise nah.
Captain Pessimist
Well I probably wouldn't be able to afford one brand new
I'd have like a cb7 accord or something...I'm sooo glad I decided against that and bought the celi. But yes, styling wise our cars DO look better than 99% of the new cars comming out, though they would need to be more powerfull to really compete.
"A true car enthusiast can see the potential in any car"QUOTE (njccmd2002 @ Oct 3, 2008 - 2:01 PM)i rather be a slow turtle in risk of extinction, than a fast locust, that you can see everywhere and need to be terminated.
Okay, I checked the horsepower ratings again for the domestic models in the brochure. I guess the U.S. models were 135 hp because of some quota about average corporate gas mileage, but in Japan they were 255, 180, or 140. That's net. I don't know if they rate horsepower differently in the U.S.
Price? Yeah. Mine was over $30,000 in 1995, but that was new and a domestic version of the convertible. Used it wouldn't be much today. I don't know what the price would be for a 2008 Celi if they existed.
If it were being introduced just now, of course, the technology would be updated, and if the market demanded it, one would hope the horsepower would be competitive. In asking the question, I was thinking mainly about the styling, and I feel it has held up pretty well in that regard. I don't see many good-looking new cars these days.
This post has been edited by LCARS_24: Mar 23, 2008 - 12:49 PM
Price? Yeah. Mine was over $30,000 in 1995, but that was new and a domestic version of the convertible. Used it wouldn't be much today. I don't know what the price would be for a 2008 Celi if they existed.
If it were being introduced just now, of course, the technology would be updated, and if the market demanded it, one would hope the horsepower would be competitive. In asking the question, I was thinking mainly about the styling, and I feel it has held up pretty well in that regard. I don't see many good-looking new cars these days.
This post has been edited by LCARS_24: Mar 23, 2008 - 12:49 PM
i think if the 6gc was just coming out for 2008 and it was styled the way it is now there would definatly been more HP and i also think the taillights and rear bumper are a lil outdated IMO and that would be something they would change
94 Celica GT Hatchback 5spd89 Nissan 240sx coupe 5spd -RIP87 BMW 325 2dr 5spd - SOLD-Gone but never forgotten
just the body style would hold it up. i'd hope toyota would step up with the HP side of the game
QUOTE"And, as always, your friendship, help, and dedication to the advancement of Texas Celica dominance is GREATLY appreciated. Thanks bro." -DEATH1994 GT:V6 swap, 5speed E53 W/ LSD, All Power, now RED1995 ST:SOLD @273k miles, Auto, all power, CarPC, White1994 ST:Totaled, 5spd, all power, RedRIP 07/09/09 @ 241,8101994 Lexus LS400:This is my new DD
Well if ST202 came out with I-VVT-i (ACIS with VVT-i
) side skirts projector lights rear splitters front lip and more optional parts/extras (choice of FF or 4WD)
If the ST205 was VVt-i and turbo (like the newer supras did
)
and if they worked on the cars computer more, but really I just wish there was more aftermarket/performance parts you could use.
so yeah I would... as long as it doesn't cost heaps
This post has been edited by Rusty: Mar 24, 2008 - 2:43 AM
If the ST205 was VVt-i and turbo (like the newer supras did
and if they worked on the cars computer more, but really I just wish there was more aftermarket/performance parts you could use.
so yeah I would... as long as it doesn't cost heaps
This post has been edited by Rusty: Mar 24, 2008 - 2:43 AM
ST202 SS-II CELICA threadNew Zealand members check inSticky thread's: How to contribute and troubleshoot.
G6 is a pontiac...
6GC is a Celica.
6GC is a Celica.
1991 MR2 - T-tops - Crimson Red - Gen3 3SGTE - Lots of moneyI'm not really an asshole, but I play one on the internet.**** Photobucket
the interior is way way to out of date to be a 2008 car.
>
I was thinking the same thing when I saw the title.
>
Are you serious? I get more compliments on the interior than anything else by people who sit in my car. The only prettier interior I've ever seen [and I've seen a whoooooole lot] is the MKIV Supra which basically looks like a more expensive version of ours. meh - personaly aesthetics I suppose.
I voted yes but was thinking only if the gave us the ST-205 this time with a few things updated.
QUOTE(95CelicaST @ Mar 24, 2008 - 3:49 PM) [snapback]657391[/snapback]
>
G6 is a pontiac...
6GC is a Celica.
G6 is a pontiac...
6GC is a Celica.
I was thinking the same thing when I saw the title.
>
QUOTE(Hanyo @ Mar 24, 2008 - 4:37 PM) [snapback]657416[/snapback]
>
the interior is way way to out of date to be a 2008 car.
the interior is way way to out of date to be a 2008 car.
Are you serious? I get more compliments on the interior than anything else by people who sit in my car. The only prettier interior I've ever seen [and I've seen a whoooooole lot] is the MKIV Supra which basically looks like a more expensive version of ours. meh - personaly aesthetics I suppose.
I voted yes but was thinking only if the gave us the ST-205 this time with a few things updated.
ENGINE: '93 RC 3S-GTE/WRC CT-20b [18-20PSI]PERF: TRD/HKS/ARP/NGK/MSD/ACT/Blitz/STRI/APEX'i/TwosRus/GReddy/Magnaflo/KOYOSUSP: Tein/Bilstein/SusTech/INT: SS-III SEATS/Toyota Hyper SportsEXT: WRC/TRD/404QUOTE (lagos @ Aug 25, 2010 - 10:13 AM)Its a safety feature so that people like you don't end up killing themselves or everyone around them.Slow down Paul Walker.6GC Chat - Go there: [url="http://www.griffgirl.com/forum/chat/index.php[/url]
i think... if toyota offered the 1nzfe engine (echo i believe?) at 130hp or something as a base trim economy version, then offered the 2zz as a gt model with 190hp and then offered a 300 some v6 model as a gt-s
that way... highschool type kids could possibly afford a 15k base line cool looking car. college students could afford a bit peppier 25k one. and the enthusiasts could get the loaded one for like ~40k
the biggest problem car makers seem to have when making the next big hit, is a good design at a good price.
take the evo's - pretty expensive, and in the tuner world great performance, but... looking at the high end cars, its the bottom end.
if toyota makes any kind of sports car, and another manufacturer makes one thats 5k less, with the same performance and same aggressiveness in looks, the toyota would never sell.
the general designs are timeless in my mind. besides my paint being crappy most people think its like a new 09 model toyota. then i tell em nope, its an old car.
that way... highschool type kids could possibly afford a 15k base line cool looking car. college students could afford a bit peppier 25k one. and the enthusiasts could get the loaded one for like ~40k
the biggest problem car makers seem to have when making the next big hit, is a good design at a good price.
take the evo's - pretty expensive, and in the tuner world great performance, but... looking at the high end cars, its the bottom end.
if toyota makes any kind of sports car, and another manufacturer makes one thats 5k less, with the same performance and same aggressiveness in looks, the toyota would never sell.
the general designs are timeless in my mind. besides my paint being crappy most people think its like a new 09 model toyota. then i tell em nope, its an old car.
you know why they put sheep at the edge of a cliff.... that way they push back!(2:27:32 AM) edit: please f*cking work, f*ck, sh*t, piss(2:28:08 AM) edit: that did the trick
>
$40k for only a 300hp celica?!!!? Wasn't the gt-4 only (the equivelent of) like $30-$35k?
I mean I get you're concept, but NO ONE (at least not the mojority of people who could afford it) would want to pay $40 grand for a celica.
QUOTE(jason @ Mar 24, 2008 - 10:28 PM) [snapback]657441[/snapback]
>
i think... if toyota offered the 1nzfe engine (echo i believe?) at 130hp or something as a base trim economy version, then offered the 2zz as a gt model with 190hp and then offered a 300 some v6 model as a gt-s
that way... highschool type kids could possibly afford a 15k base line cool looking car. college students could afford a bit peppier 25k one. and the enthusiasts could get the loaded one for like ~40k
the biggest problem car makers seem to have when making the next big hit, is a good design at a good price.
i think... if toyota offered the 1nzfe engine (echo i believe?) at 130hp or something as a base trim economy version, then offered the 2zz as a gt model with 190hp and then offered a 300 some v6 model as a gt-s
that way... highschool type kids could possibly afford a 15k base line cool looking car. college students could afford a bit peppier 25k one. and the enthusiasts could get the loaded one for like ~40k
the biggest problem car makers seem to have when making the next big hit, is a good design at a good price.
$40k for only a 300hp celica?!!!? Wasn't the gt-4 only (the equivelent of) like $30-$35k?
I mean I get you're concept, but NO ONE (at least not the mojority of people who could afford it) would want to pay $40 grand for a celica.
"A true car enthusiast can see the potential in any car"QUOTE (njccmd2002 @ Oct 3, 2008 - 2:01 PM)i rather be a slow turtle in risk of extinction, than a fast locust, that you can see everywhere and need to be terminated.
Looks wise, we'd be okay with the projectors to make it look more modern. Horsepower wise if it is still the ST and GT, 6gc's would be undesirable.
94 Celica GT|Toyota OEM Japan|Toyota Racing Development|Tom's|Competition Clutch|5Zigen|Apexi||Laille/Beatrush|Magnecor|Denso|Royal Purple|Optima|PIAA|PW JDM|Megan Racing|Nitto||Work|Greddy|Samco|Project Mu|H&R|Gates|Moog|Rota|Yokohama|Epman|1320|Upgr804 Celica GT|Toyota OEM Japan|Toyota Racing Development|Tein|BC Racing|Greddy|89 Supra (Sold)90 Supra (Sold)
I think the front end would have to be redone a little, but that wouldn't mean getting rid of the twin headlights. Fundamentally, the 6GC is very similar to the latest Aston Martins, the Bentley Continental GT and the Hyundai Coupe.
make it look less like a bubble, if your looking at the front and more flatter
ST202 SS-II CELICA threadNew Zealand members check inSticky thread's: How to contribute and troubleshoot.
[i think your right about the lack of power, but the uk gt like mine is 177bhp stock so i think it could compete quite nicely
>
I'm not saying our interior is bad.
But think about it, look our cool halo blue digital gauges.... Oh wait we dont have any. We still have the yucky green 90's era analog gauges.
we only have a black on black and some more black theme with our dash.
look at the 2008 XD interior. They give you something beside black...
This post has been edited by Hanyo: Apr 1, 2008 - 6:02 AM
QUOTE(DEATH @ Mar 24, 2008 - 2:49 PM) [snapback]657428[/snapback]
>
Are you serious? I get more compliments on the interior than anything else by people who sit in my car. The only prettier interior I've ever seen [and I've seen a whoooooole lot] is the MKIV Supra which basically looks like a more expensive version of ours. meh - personaly aesthetics I suppose.
I voted yes but was thinking only if the gave us the ST-205 this time with a few things updated.
Are you serious? I get more compliments on the interior than anything else by people who sit in my car. The only prettier interior I've ever seen [and I've seen a whoooooole lot] is the MKIV Supra which basically looks like a more expensive version of ours. meh - personaly aesthetics I suppose.
I voted yes but was thinking only if the gave us the ST-205 this time with a few things updated.
I'm not saying our interior is bad.
But think about it, look our cool halo blue digital gauges.... Oh wait we dont have any. We still have the yucky green 90's era analog gauges.
we only have a black on black and some more black theme with our dash.
look at the 2008 XD interior. They give you something beside black...
This post has been edited by Hanyo: Apr 1, 2008 - 6:02 AM
my $0.02...
if i could buy a SS-III or a GT4 i would. i'd sell my 6gc and my BMW 540i, all my PCs and A/V gear and finance the rest. i would go as high as 30K$. i luv our car but the lack of power would not make it a popular purchase on today's market.
if i could buy a SS-III or a GT4 i would. i'd sell my 6gc and my BMW 540i, all my PCs and A/V gear and finance the rest. i would go as high as 30K$. i luv our car but the lack of power would not make it a popular purchase on today's market.
>
me niether.... the new mustangs are only about $30k with 315hp. and thats got to be the most common car i've seen on the streets lately.
but now, if Toyota created a $30k 300hp AWD Celica here in the states, you better believe i'd get a second job and sell my plasma every other weekend to buy one
QUOTE(96bluevert @ Mar 24, 2008 - 8:47 PM) [snapback]657508[/snapback]
>
$40k for only a 300hp celica?!!!? Wasn't the gt-4 only (the equivelent of) like $30-$35k?
I mean I get you're concept, but NO ONE (at least not the mojority of people who could afford it) would want to pay $40 grand for a celica.
$40k for only a 300hp celica?!!!? Wasn't the gt-4 only (the equivelent of) like $30-$35k?
I mean I get you're concept, but NO ONE (at least not the mojority of people who could afford it) would want to pay $40 grand for a celica.
me niether.... the new mustangs are only about $30k with 315hp. and thats got to be the most common car i've seen on the streets lately.
but now, if Toyota created a $30k 300hp AWD Celica here in the states, you better believe i'd get a second job and sell my plasma every other weekend to buy one
1st car- 1994 Celica GT 2.2L 5s-feSOLD2nd car- 1995 Celica ST 2.0L 3s-gteSOLDCurrent car- 1996 Z28 Camaro 5.7L LT1