http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

This post has been edited by playr158: Aug 14, 2006 - 3:38 PM

yea ..the whole thing is weird but then again its madox...and he hates everything

the only thing i like about that website is the counter:

>

For those that don't know what a "bukkake" is, I pity you. Get your learn on.


That guy does nothing to disprove anything. He just says "nah ugh!", and calls people names. Popular Mechanics does a nice job. And of course, coming from them, it makes sense. But there has still yet to be visual evidence. That's all I'm offering to this.

That, and the bukkake link. Bc that shxt is funny.

-John-

SPLAT...rofl

>

Where I am from, the people positing the wacky theory are the ones who have to present the evidence.

You want the truth? All the conspiracy stuff regarding 9/11 is pure crap. There ya go.

Edit: I can't believe Dan and I agree on something.

This post has been edited by jgreening: Aug 14, 2006 - 1:37 PM

OMG HOLY CRAP...we do

a+

>

there is evidence. the fact that you don't believe it doesn't make it untrue. it just means you don't believe it. it's not really a wacky theory anyway. saying the conspiracy theories re: 9/11 is "pure crap" is your opinion. i have mine.

there have been many questions about the events, and no, not just the "loose change" video. the opposing sides do have evidence j, in the form of pictures, videos, statements, etc. notice i said "VISUAL EVIDENCE". everyone says this, and says that, but there is never a picture of a plane (specifically speaking of the pentagon and PA/flight 93 site). as i told dan. i'm not against being proved wrong, i'd like to be. i'd like to think the govenerment wouldn't do something like that, but i honestly don't put it past them.

i'm not going into it anymore than that. there is/was already a thread somewhat about this, and it's something that will spiral down into a debate, and get locked by the fun police. you're entitled to your opinion, as i am to mine. but, since it's not your's, and in the best interest of the nation, that makes it ridiculous and ignorant. i let you have your opinion, so let me have mine.

-John-

BTW Dan, before you poke like a smart ass at people for being smart, maybe you should proofread your own titles for your posts...

This post has been edited by Mynzeyes: Aug 14, 2006 - 2:51 PM

i duno wat your talking about my title is fine .

>

FTW!!!

MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

editable forums ftw

>

Thats one of the great things about our country. You have a right to be wrong. As long as you acknowledge that your belief in this hocus pocus is just an opinion, I have no issues. The problem I have is with all these people who spout it off like its fact and even have the audacity to post up "so called evidence" that is completely crap.

We have to remember that the one positing the position has the burden to prove it - not the one trying to prove the negative.

Can I prove that the government was not involved with 9/11? No, but I have seen no credible evidence to the contrary. As such, why would I even think such a thing? I am an American after all.

>

x2.

jesus christ i hate this ****, conspiracy theorists are so ****ing gay. go put on a tin foil hat, you cocksmoking fagmasters.



**** YES a secret message in the 100$ bill that proves that glenn beck and his video are wrong.

GO USA

edit: explain to me this conspiracy theorists, why would osama put videos out taking credit for the attacks? surely he would want us to think america did it because he hates america and his entire mission is to destroy america.

This post has been edited by brianforster: Aug 14, 2006 - 5:41 PM

am i the only one who finds all of that hilarious.

nah i laugh at stupid people too jen

Weird that all the stupid people are the educated ones, and aren't like sheep being blindly led around.

If Osama was to blame, then why the hell haven't we found him? And why don't we have a larger presence where he is? We can find Saddam in a "hole in the ground"(most likely staged), but we can't find Osama? Yeah, right.

Do you all believe everything that the government tells us, down to the T..?

-John-

BTW: Brian, nothing personal, still like you as a person, but don't bother replying. Calling people what you did competely destroys your opinion's value because of the complete Neanderthaloid structure of it, so don't even bother. I mean, you can, bc that's your right, but it won't be paid attention to. At least, not by me.

This post has been edited by Mynzeyes: Aug 14, 2006 - 6:32 PM

>

You're the one who made the title of this thread "wow your smart". So, do you laugh at yourself?

its not like im against homosexuality, but its the same thing as me calling my white friends jews or n*****s id never actualy call a jew a jew, or a black person a n*****, just like i wouldnt call a homosexual a cocksmoking faggot..

edit: its just my obnoxious personality, im not trying to be offensive, but its just the person i am.. i like being loud and out there. like i said id never call any of those groups there names.

This post has been edited by brianforster: Aug 14, 2006 - 10:25 PM

>

so you'd call them that behind their backs....thats fukd up yo

no.. i never said that, jesus, i mean REALLY, do you like, TRY to misread what i type? because you seriously try to call me out on **** that i have never said, its getting VERY old. please learn some reading comprehension skills and get back to me.


i said that i have no problem calling lets say a white friend the N word as a joke, or a christian friend a jew as a joke, or a straight friend gay as a joke, but i would never call a black friend the n word, to his face or behind his back, id never call a jew friend a jew to his face or behind his back, and id never call a gay friend gay to his face or behind his back..

its just the connotations.. get over it.